Annual Maine case filings
Baseline workload across case types. Progress should be measured against actual statewide demand, not anecdotes.
A serious modernization effort should publish the metrics that show whether backlog is shrinking, hearings are arriving more prepared, and taxpayers are getting real throughput instead of implementation theater.
Baseline workload across case types. Progress should be measured against actual statewide demand, not anecdotes.
Family matters create the fastest real-world harm when scheduling, packet readiness, or communication structure fails.
The public already has documented evidence of staffing strain. Technology should reduce rework, not just confirm overload.
Capacity pressure should be paired with better intake and hearing readiness, not treated as a staffing-only conversation.
Calendar pressure remains elevated. A working platform should reduce preventable delay before matters hit hearing day.
The state has already spent meaningful money. Public reporting should show whether new spending produces measurable movement.
A KPI page should do more than decorate the site. It should let the public track whether backlog pressure, hearing readiness, filing completeness, and operational throughput are materially changing.
The public should be able to see whether operations are actually improving for families, litigants, clerks, and judges — not just whether another software contract was announced.