How often filings arrive complete enough to avoid clerk rework and prevent avoidable delay.
Public accountability requires visible KPIs, not vague promises.
A serious modernization effort should publish the metrics that show whether backlog is shrinking, hearings are arriving more prepared, and taxpayers are getting real throughput instead of another software contract press release.
Whether required documents, evidence, and chronology are assembled before court time is spent.
How many avoidable touches occur before a filing is actually ready.
How quickly a case can be turned into an actionable, readable summary for work and review.
These are the numbers the public should demand.
Median time from intake to filing-ready packet.
Percentage of cases with structured timeline generated within 24 hours of upload.
Percentage of hearings with all required documents present before the calendar date.
Reduction in continuances tied to incomplete records or avoidable procedural defects.
The KPI stack a pilot should publish
If the state is serious about modernization, it should agree up front on the metrics that define success.
Why this matters politically
Public trust rises when modernization is tied to measurable outcomes, not vague promises.
If the system improves, publish the improvement. If it does not, the public deserves to know that too.
ProSe is built to expose operational truth, not hide behind implementation theater.
Maine Judicial Branch FY24 Annual Report; Maine Judicial Branch Workload Assessment Study; 2026 State of the Judiciary; NCSC access-to-justice, AI-readiness, and self-help research; public reporting on legacy-system spending and annual operating fees.